ok, this is an interesting topic that you might be able to help me understand. What I got so far is that paracons., is used as to represent the certain set of possibilities (a representation of the "context") within which, a sign may take a range of meanings (reduced with the help of probabilistic math) Programming languages reproduce (so far) the way we make assumptions, in a way, our conscious thinking that can be either true or false(thus 0,1) but the language of our unconscious (collective, socially constructed and common) is beyond true/false, without loosing any of its consistency and "realness".So I see the attempt of the semantic web language to represent that logic. Its sounds like science fiction right now, but maybe its something feasible.
In that sense, I wouldn't describe your answer as true/false, but I would be able to describe YOU and your range of inconsistencies (which are specifically yours) whithin which I would estimate the value of your answer. I apologize for my clumsy attempts to understand this. I find it fascinating and I would appreciate your help-if you have any reference/links to the topic, please post here
Systems everywhere
ReplyDeletehello mr.para_Consistent
ReplyDeletemaps everywhere
(wouldn't it be nice to be really anonymous-pfffff, infinite man x)
ReplyDeleteNo, it would not.
ReplyDeleteso you don't like who you are..hmmm
ReplyDeletethat's a start (or is it not)
Mmmm, it is the assumption game and hello to Alan.
ReplyDeletelet me see...
ReplyDeleteA_being anonymous is not nice
B_you are anonymous
the logical assumption would be???
(of course we could use the paraconsistent logic
but your consistency of expression leaves little place for it)
ok, this is an interesting topic that you might be able to help me understand.
ReplyDeleteWhat I got so far is that paracons., is used as to represent the certain set of possibilities (a representation of the "context") within which, a sign may take a range of meanings (reduced with the help of probabilistic math)
Programming languages reproduce (so far) the way we make assumptions, in a way, our conscious thinking that can be either true or false(thus 0,1)
but the language of our unconscious (collective, socially constructed and common) is beyond true/false, without loosing any of its consistency and "realness".So I see the attempt of the semantic web language to represent that logic.
Its sounds like science fiction right now, but maybe its something feasible.
In that sense, I wouldn't describe your answer as true/false, but I would be able to describe YOU and your range of inconsistencies (which are specifically yours) whithin which I would estimate the value of your answer.
I apologize for my clumsy attempts to understand this. I find it fascinating and I would appreciate your help-if you have any reference/links to the topic, please post here
You may start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Łukasiewicz and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lofti_Zadeh
ReplyDeletethank you my friend
ReplyDeleteI'll look it up
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraconsistent":
ReplyDeleteDo you think anyone will be champion of Euro 2012?
Posted by Anonymous to The Cybercades Project at 16 October 2011 08:11