μα ωραίο είναι αυτό;!σαν να πέρασαν και να μην άγγιξαν... υπάρχει μια μεγάλη διαφορά μεταξύ αθάνατου και αιώνιου κι έχει να κάνει με τον τρόπο που αντιλαμβανόμαστε (και) την υποκειμενικότητα/ατομικότητα
πολύ ιντρίγκιν το λινκ σου και το ποστ σου ευχαριστώ χ
αααχ τι να πω; νταξ, συμφωνώ, αλλά επειδή μέχρι να γίνω άνθρωπος θα μου πάρει κάτι δεκαετίες, μια διακοσάρα χρόνια την ήθελα :-) φρέσκια και υγιής εννοείται... πέρα απ'την πλάκα όμως, το θέμα είναι να ζήσει κανείς, όχι το ότι θα πεθάνει.δύσκολη παραδοχή.
Insight into the areas of the "similar"has a fundamental importance for the illumination of large areas of occult knowledge.Such insight,however,is to be gained less by demonstrating found similarities than by reproducing processes which produce such similarities. Nature produces similarities-one need only think of mimicry.Human beings,however,possess the very highest capability to produce similarities.Indeed,there may not be a single one of the higher human functions which is not decisively co-determined by the mimetic faculty.This faculty,however,has a history,both phylogene-tically and ontogenetically.With respect to the latter,it is in many ways formed by play.To begin with,children's games are everywhere interlaced with mimetic modes of behavior,and their range is not limited at all to what one human being imitates from another. A child not only plays at being a grocer or a teacher,but also at being a windmill or a train. The question which matters, however,is the following:whatdoes a human being actually gain by this training in mimetic attitudes?The answer presupposes a clear reflection on the phylogenetic impor-tance of mimetic behavior.To determine this,it does not suffice to think,for example,merely of what the concept of similarity means for us today.As we know,the sphere of life which once seemed to be ruled by the law of similarity used to be much larger.It was the microcosm and the macrocosm,to give but one version of the many found by the experience of similarity over the course of history.It can still be maintained to day that the cases in which people consciously perceive similarities in everyday life are a minute segment of those countless cases unconsciously determined by similarity.The similarities which one perceives consciously,for instance in faces, are,when compared to the countless similarities perceived unconsciously or not at all,like the enormous underwater mass of an iceberg in comparison to the small tip which one sees projecting above the waves.
13 comments:
sand grain--star
ολομερικότητα
http://www.galilean-library.org/site/index.php/topic/1041-the-struldbruggs/
ωραία ράτσα αυτοι οι struldbruggs. πεθαμένη απέθαντη
ΚΚΜ
μα ωραίο είναι αυτό;!σαν να πέρασαν και να μην άγγιξαν...
υπάρχει μια μεγάλη διαφορά μεταξύ αθάνατου και αιώνιου
κι έχει να κάνει με τον τρόπο που αντιλαμβανόμαστε (και) την υποκειμενικότητα/ατομικότητα
πολύ ιντρίγκιν το λινκ σου
και το ποστ σου
ευχαριστώ
χ
Να κάτι που δεν θα ευχόμουν ποτέ. Αθανασία. Μοιάζει με τιμωρία, ε?
αααχ τι να πω;
νταξ, συμφωνώ, αλλά επειδή μέχρι να γίνω άνθρωπος θα μου πάρει κάτι δεκαετίες, μια διακοσάρα χρόνια την ήθελα :-)
φρέσκια και υγιής εννοείται...
πέρα απ'την πλάκα όμως, το θέμα είναι να ζήσει κανείς, όχι το ότι θα πεθάνει.δύσκολη παραδοχή.
Να σου πω την αλήθεια πιο πολύ με προβληματίζει το πως ζω παρά το οτι θα πεθάνω. Χώρος καλή μου και για τους άλλους...
όπως είχε πει και η μεγάλη Φρίντα Κάλοου "εύχομαι να πεθάνω και να μην επιστρέψω ποτέ ξανά" :-)
εγώ επέστρεψα στο εξωτικό μου προάστιο πάντως.ωραία είναι κι εδώ.
είσαι ακόμα στο νησί;
χχχ
Μπα...επέστρεψα. Αλλά θα ξαναφύγω:-)
Γειά σου Χτίνα, Ωταίο το ποοήμα αλλά και τα σχόλια σας.
το ποίημα είναι θραύσμα από την βίβλο (Γένεσις 22:17)
τα μαύρα μας σχόλια είναι παράδοξα/ ωραία, ναι :-)
καλημέρα στέλιο!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19792369/Walter-Benjamin-Doctrine-of-the-Similar
Insight into the areas of the "similar"has a fundamental importance for the illumination of large areas of occult knowledge.Such insight,however,is to be gained less by demonstrating found similarities than by reproducing processes which produce such similarities. Nature produces similarities-one need only think of mimicry.Human beings,however,possess the very highest capability to produce similarities.Indeed,there may not be a single one of the higher human functions which is not decisively co-determined by the mimetic faculty.This faculty,however,has a history,both phylogene-tically and ontogenetically.With respect to the latter,it is in many ways formed by play.To begin with,children's games are everywhere interlaced with mimetic modes of behavior,and their range is not limited at all to what one human being imitates from another. A child not only plays at being a grocer or a teacher,but also at being a windmill or a train. The question which matters, however,is the following:whatdoes a human being actually gain by this training in mimetic attitudes?The answer presupposes a clear reflection on the phylogenetic impor-tance of mimetic behavior.To determine this,it does not suffice to think,for example,merely of what the concept of similarity means for us today.As we know,the sphere of life which once seemed to be ruled by the law of similarity used to be much larger.It was the microcosm and the macrocosm,to give but one version of the many found by the experience of similarity over the course of history.It can still be maintained to day that the cases in which people consciously perceive similarities in everyday life are a minute segment of those countless cases unconsciously determined by similarity.The similarities which one perceives consciously,for instance in faces, are,when compared to the countless similarities perceived unconsciously or not at all,like the enormous underwater mass of an iceberg in comparison to the small tip which one sees projecting above the waves.
http://plagal.wordpress.com/2012/07/28/youre-doing-it-wrong/
Post a Comment